CONFLICT-DOCTRINE
When
divisions are rife in religion, it is bound to happen that what is in men's
minds will soon erupt in real conflict. For while nothing is more effective for
joining us together, and there is nothing which does more to unite our minds,
and keep them peaceful, than agreement in religion, yet if disagreement has
somehow arisen in connection with it, the inevitable result is that men are
quickly stirred up to engage in fighting, and there is no other field with
fiercer disputes
1 Corinthians, p. 26-27.
In matters in
which Scripture is not explicit there is room for difference of opinion.
John MacArthur
1 Corinthians, Moody, 1984, p. 27.
“Schism” –
People who were agreed about the centralities of the faith dividing and
separating from one another over matters that were not
essential to salvation, not absolutely vital. This is always one of the
dangers afflicting us as evangelicals… We can be so rigid, so over-strict, and
so narrow that we become guilty of schism.
Martyn Lloyd-Jones
What is an Evangelical? The Banner of Truth
Trust, 1992, p. 20-21.
We must be
very careful to draw this distinction between essentials and non-essentials
lest we become guilty of schism and begin to rend the body of Christ.
Martyn Lloyd-Jones
What is an Evangelical? The Banner of Truth Trust,
1992, p. 90
Articles or
rules for doctrine or practice in matters of religion to be imposed upon men,
should be as few as may be; there is very great danger in the unnecessary
multiplying them. This in all ages has caused division and exceeding
disturbances in the churches of Christ.
Jeremiah Burroughs
A Puritan Golden Treasury, compiled by I.D.E. Thomas, by permission of Banner
of Truth, Carlisle, PA. 2000, p. 303.
Unity is not
found in uniformity of thought, but in the fellowship of the Spirit, based on
sound doctrine which, in turn, is predicated on the clear teaching of
Scripture. This is why Paul exhorts us to “mark them which cause divisions and
offenses contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned; and avoid them” (Rom
16:17). The false prophets call for unity based not on Scriptural doctrine, but
on their (the false prophets) claim for authority. Those who insist on
fellowship based on sound doctrine are labeled legalists, while the false
prophets are the ones imposing unscriptural demands upon those who follow them.
Media Spotlight Special Report
Latter-Day Prophets: The Restoration of
Apostles and Prophets and the Kansas City-Vineyard Connection, September 1990,
p. 14.
We
believe in the five great points commonly known as Calvinistic; but we do not
regard these five points as being barbed shafts which we are to thrust between
the ribs of our fellow-Christians. We look upon them as being five great lamps
which help to irradiate the cross; or, rather, five bright emanations springing
from the glorious covenant of our Triune God, and illustrating the great
doctrines of Jesus crucified.
C.H. Spurgeon
And I am
afraid there are Calvinists, who, while they account it a proof of their
humility that they are willing in words to debase the creature, and to give all
the glory of salvation to the Lord, yet know not what manner of spirit they are
of. Whatever it be that makes us trust in ourselves that we are comparatively
wise or good, so as to treat those with contempt who do not subscribe to our
doctrines, or follow our party, is a proof and fruit of a self-righteous
spirit. Self-righteousness can feed upon doctrines, as well as upon works; and
a man may have the heart of a Pharisee, while his head is stored with orthodox
notions of the unworthiness of the creature and the riches of free grace.
John Newton
As men are
more proud of their understanding than of their disposition, it is very
probable that religious opinions are more frequently the cause of conceit and
self-importance, than anything else which could be mentioned.
J.A. James
Christian Love, 1828
I fear that
all too often Christians may be less humane and considerate than nonbelievers.
We think we are standing on principle when in reality we may be only insisting
on our opinion.
Jerry Bridges
The Practice of Godliness, NavPress, 1996, p.
187. Used by permission of NavPress – www.navpress.com.
All rights reserved.
[We must
have] the ability to distinguish issues that truly matter from ones that do
not. We do not want to be flexible about moral and theological convictions (the
great doctrines of the church). But it is also wrong to be brittle about issues
that are not foundational to our faith.
Alistair Begg
Made For His Pleasure, Moody Press, 1996, p. 36-37.
We should
teach and demonstrate that secondary matters should never be allowed to divide
Christians… We should take the lead by always asking first, “What do the
Scriptures say?” If they are not dogmatic, then we should not be.
Derek Prime and Alistair Begg
On Being a Pastor, Moody Press, 2004, p. 292.
One of the
great lessons of church history is that God has used theological controversy to
corporately sanctify His church as each Christian “contends earnestly for the
faith once delivered to the saints” (Jude 3). Many crucial doctrines have been
clarified and purified through respectful debate in the hermeneutical context
of the universal church. Indeed, this is the very reason why God allowed controversy
in the church at Corinth: “For there must also be factions (opinions) among
you, so that those who are approved may become evident among you” (1 Cor.
11:19). Yet to avoid the disunity of the Corinthian church, we must handle our
opinions with abundant humility and grace.
John
Thompson
The Sufficiency of Scripture: By What
Standard? April 3, 2003, www.visionforumministries.org,
Used by Permission.
First
level theological issues would include those doctrines most central and
essential to the Christian faith… Denial of these doctrines represents nothing
less than an eventual denial of Christianity itself… The set of second-order
doctrines is distinguished from the first-order set by the fact that believing
Christians may disagree on the second-order issues, though this disagreement
will create significant boundaries between believers… Third-order issues are
doctrines over which Christians may disagree and remain in close fellowship,
even within local congregations. I would put most debates over eschatology, for
example, in this category… Christians should never separate from a church over
third-order issues.
Albert Mohler
Should I Stay or Should I Go? September
2009, Tabletalk, p. 20-21. Used by Permission.
It is a
thousand pities when these differences become the occasion of alienating
brethren from one another. This can happen all too easily when we ride
roughshod over one another in discussion, debate and conversation. It can
happen, too, when doubtful opinions are reckoned as dogmas and minor matters
contended for as if the very life of the gospel depended on them.
Maurice Roberts
Banner of Truth Magazine.
Not all doctrines are equally important. They are equally
true, but not all truth is equally important. It isn’t a matter of some
doctrines being “more true” than others, as if some doctrines are partially
false. It is rather that some doctrines bear less impact than others on our
capacity to know, love, and obey God.
Sam
Storms
Authority
and Method in Theology, November 8, 2006, www.enjoyinggodministries.com. Used by Permission.