EVOLUTION-IGNORANCE
If the solar
system was brought about by an accidental collision, then the appearance of
organic life on this planet was also an accident, and the whole evolution of
Man was an accident too. If so, then all our present thoughts are accidents – the
accidental by-product of the movement of atoms. And this holds for the thoughts
of the materialists and astronomers as well as for anyone else's. But if their
thoughts are merely accidental by-products, why should we believe them to be
true? I see no reason for believing that one accident should be able to give me
a correct account of all the other accidents.
For the
scientist who has lived by his faith in the power of reason, the story ends
like a bad dream. He has scaled the mountains of ignorance; he is about to
conquer the highest peak; as he pulls himself over the final rock, he is
greeted by a band of theologians who have been there for centuries.
Robert Jastrow
The principle
"that every effect must have a cause is a self-evident truth, not only for
those who have been trained in logic, but for thinking people everywhere."
Cause and effect, "which is universally accepted and followed
in every field of science, relates every phenomenon as an effect to a cause.
No effect is ever quantitatively 'great' nor
qualitatively 'superior' to its cause. An effect can be lower than its cause
but never higher." In stark contrast, the competing theory of evolution
attempts to make effects such as organized complexity, life, and personality
greater than their causes-disorder, nonlife, and impersonal forces. As has been
well said, "design requires a designer, and that
is precisely what is lacking in non-theistic [materialistic] evolution."
Hank Hanegraaff
Resurrection, W Publishing Group, 2000, p.
105.
Philosophical
naturalism-the world-view undergirding evolutionism-can provide only three
explanations for the existence of the universe in which we live. The first is
that the universe is merely an illusion. This notion carries little weight in
an age of scientific enlightenment. As has been well said, "even a full-blown solipsist looks both ways before crossing
the street." The second is that the universe sprang from nothing. As
previously pointed out, this proposition flies in the face of the law of cause
and effect. And the third is that the universe eternally existed. This
hypothesis is devastated by the law of entropy, which predicts that a universe
that has eternally existed would have died an "eternity ago" from
heat loss. There is, however, one other
possibility. It is found in the first chapter of the first book of the Bible:
"In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth" (Genesis
1:1). In an age of enlightenment and empirical science, nothing could be more
certain, clear or correct.
Hank Hanegraaff
Resurrection, W Publishing Group, 2000, p.
105.
What
naturalists call “science” isn’t really science – at least not if science means
following the evidence! Naturalists like to think of themselves as brave
defenders of clear reasoning against irrational superstition, but actually
naturalism itself is the superstition. It isn’t supported by reasoning but by
blind hostility to the evidence of God.
J. Budziszewski
Copied
from How to Stay Christian in College by J. Budziszewski copyright 2004, p.52. Used
by permission of NavPress (Think Books) - www.navpress.com. All
rights reserved.
“Slightly
lower than the angels” is a whole lot better than slightly higher than the
apes. Let’s get the order straight. God, angelic beings, man,
animals, and vegetables.
Stuart Briscoe
Unless the
being of a God be presupposed, no tolerable account can be given of the being
of anything.
Ezekiel Hopkins
A Puritan Golden Treasury, compiled by I.D.E. Thomas, by permission of Banner of Truth, Carlisle, PA. 2000, p. 27.
The
evolutionists seem to know everything about the missing link except the fact
that he is missing.
C.K. Chesterton
It may happen
that in a little time the doctrine of evolution will be the standing jest of
schoolboys.
C.H. Spurgeon
After
listening to a lecture on evolution by a science professor, a student wrote a
poem and titled it “The Amazing Professor.” The poem read: Once I was a tadpole
when I began to begin. Then I was a frog with my tail tucked in. Next I was a
monkey on a coconut tree. Now I am a doctor with a PhD (Anonymous). [Evolution
is] one of the stupidest theories of Western life.
Malcolm Muggeridge