December 1, 2002 Pastor Randy
Smith
If you were absent last
week, you are finding us in the second of two fugitive messages that I have
chosen to preach on the Sabbath. You will recall, as we have been studying the
Gospel of John, that the opposition to Jesus occurred in chapter 5 when He healed
a paralyzed man on the Sabbath.
Just as it was during the
time of Jesus, there is much misunderstanding today surrounding the issue of
the Sabbath. Therefore, through these two messages entitled: "Sunday, Sabbath
or the Lords Day," I am seeking to bring biblical clarity and practical
application to an often confusing topic for most Christians under the New Covenant.
Lets begin in the
first point with a review of last weeks message. What is our response
as Christians to the Jewish Sabbath?
RESPONSE TO THE
JEWISH SABBATH
The Sabbath was
a command given specifically to Israel.
There is no record whatsoever
of anybody keeping the Sabbath prior to Exodus 16 (Neh. 9:13-14). Even after
they received the full-blown Sabbath command (Ex. 20:8-11), Israel who often
condemned the sins of her pagan neighbors, never criticized their violation
of the Sabbath.
The Sabbath was part
of Gods ceremonial law and not part of Gods moral law.
The Sabbath was
a ceremonial law given specifically to Israel, not grounded in Gods unchanging
nature. Similar to the other ceremonial laws, and the Old Covenant in general,
it has been fulfilled and brought to completion in Christ (Mt. 5:17). If David
had a right to make an exception in the ceremonial law, Jesus had more (Mt.
12:1-8). Even Jesus said," The Sabbath was made for man, and not
man for the Sabbath" (Mk. 2:27). Moreover, He called Himself the "Lord
of the Sabbath" (Lk. 6:5).
The Sabbath was a sign
of the Old Covenant (Ex. 31:16-17; Neh. 9:14; Eze. 20:12).
Because we are now under
the New Covenant, we are no longer under obligation to keep the Old Covenant,
particularly a sign of the Old Covenant. The writer to the Hebrews remarked,
"When He said, A new covenant, He has made the first obsolete.
But whatever is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to disappear"
(Heb. 8:13).
The New Testament nowhere
commands Christians to observe the Sabbath.
The church is warned of
many sins in the New Testament, but breaking (or observing) the Sabbath is never
mentioned. The book of Acts mentions the Sabbath nine times, never once as a
day of worship for Christians. If anything, the Apostle Paul rebuked the Galatians
for attempting to add the observance of days to the sufficiency of Christs
work for salvation (Gal. 4:9-11). The church even changed their day of worship
from Saturday (the Jewish Sabbath) to Sunday (the Lords Day) (Ac. 20:7;
1 Cor. 16:7) to show that a new order had been erected with the resurrection
of Christ (Jn. 20:1, 19).
Jesus Christ through
His redemptive work regained the Sabbath that Adam lost.
Jesus Christ came to complete
a redemptive work (Jn. 4:34; 5:36) by restoring the rest that was forfeited
in the Garden. In following the same pattern for the first creation, Jesus Christ
began the work spoken of in Genesis 3:15 (c.f. Gen. 1:3). He completed the work
on the cross (Jn. 17:4; 19:30; c.f. Gen. 1:5). The work was met with Gods
satisfaction by the resurrection and ascension of Christ (Rom. 1:3-4; Gen. 1:4)
leading again to divine rest (Heb. 10:11-12; c.f. Gen. 2:1-3).
The Sabbath was a sign
that pointed to something greater.
Like much of the Old Testament,
the Sabbath pointed to Jesus Christ. The Old Testament Sabbath preached the
gospel when it called for faith and a cessation of work (Rom. 4:4-5). We dishonor
our Savior when the signs still receive the preeminence that He alone deserves.
Now that Jesus is here, the signs have become obsolete (Heb. 8:13). The Apostle
Paul said, "Therefore no one is to act as your judge in regard to food
or drink or in respect to a festival or a new moon or a Sabbath day--things
which are a mere shadow of what is to come; but the substance belongs
to Christ" (Col. 2:16-17). Jesus is the new Joshua that leads Gods
children to a greater Promised Land of rest (Mt. 1:21). Jesus is the new Sabbatical
Jubilee (Lev. 25:8-10) that provides a greater cancellation of debts (Lk. 4:18-19).
Jesus Christ has now
become the Sabbath rest for Christians under the New Covenant.
God has completed His work
of the new creation. Christians are the first fruits of that creation (Mt. 5:17;
Gal. 6:15). Our rest, as it was enjoyed by Adam everyday, has again been restored.
During this life we still deal with some remnants of the curse, but we recognize
our rest in Christ (from meritorious works) through faith and daily worship
(Col. 3:17). Due to His redemptive work, He has become our Sabbath rest. Jesus
said, "Come to Me, all who are weary and heavy-laden, and I will give you
rest. Take My yoke upon you and learn from Me, for I am gentle and humble in
heart, and you will find rest for your souls. For My yoke is easy and My burden
is light" (Mt. 11:28-30; c.f. Heb. 4:1-11).
The Christians
ultimate Sabbath rest will be enjoyed in heaven (Rev. 14:13; c.f. 14:11).
Though we currently rest
in Jesus Christ under the New Covenant, our supreme Sabbatical rest will be
realized in heaven where we will enjoy the ultimate rest in the culmination
of Gods new creation (Rev. 21:4; 22:1-2) away from the curse in the direct
presence of the Lamb (Rev. 22:3).
RESPONSE TO CHRISTIAN
SABBARARIANS
Now that we have stated
a theological framework regarding the Sabbath, we need to build on what we have
learned pertaining to some practical application. Lets begin by considering
three questions that often arise regarding professing Christians who keep the
Sabbath.
ONE
What do I say to an individual who imposes the Sabbath as a necessary
requirement for Salvation?
The Apostle Paul dealt
with this exact issue when he evangelized the region of Galatia. After the successful
response to the gospel, certain false teachers (identified as Judaizers) infiltrated
the region and began enforcing the Mosaic requirements on the Christian converts.
One of these impositions was circumcision. They adamantly argued, "Unless
you are circumcised according to the custom of Moses, you cannot be saved"
(Ac. 15:1). Another imposition from the law was the observance of the ceremonial
days, including the Sabbath.
How would Paul respond
to such a situation? "However at that time, when you did not know God,
you were slaves to those which by nature are no gods. But now that you have
come to know God, or rather to be known by God, how is it that you turn back
again to the weak and worthless elemental things, to which you desire to be
enslaved all over again? You observe days and months and seasons and years.
I fear (a matter of eternal life and death) for you, that perhaps I have
labored over you in vain" (Gal. 4:8-11).
The Judaizers called for
Jesus Christ plus human efforts to achieve salvation. The problem with such
legalistic demands is that they detracted from the supremacy of Jesus Christ
and promoted a works-oriented gospel. Paul wanted his Galatian converts to know
that they were saved solely on the basis of grace alone through faith alone
by Christ alone. In chapter 2 verse 16 Paul argued, "Nevertheless knowing
that a man is not justified by the works of the Law but through faith in Christ
Jesus (what the sign of the Sabbath pointed toward!), even we have believed
in Christ Jesus, so that we may be justified by faith in Christ and not by the
works of the Law; since by the works of the Law no flesh will be justified."
Five verses later he said, "I do not nullify the grace of God, for if righteousness
comes through the Law, then Christ died needlessly" (Gal. 2:21).
The gospel by which we
are saved is simply faith in the Lord Jesus Christ who died as a substitute
for our sin. The moment any works are added to that message, the sufficiency
of Jesus Christ has been tainted. Such a message and its messenger must be rejected
since both have defected from the purity of the gospel. I used the word "rejected;"
the Apostle Paul was not as polite. Beginning in 1:6 the Apostle declared, "I
am amazed that you are so quickly deserting Him who called you by the grace
of Christ, for a different gospel; which is really not another; only
there are some who are disturbing you and want to distort the gospel of Christ.
But even if we, or an angel from heaven, should preach to you a gospel contrary
to what we have preached to you, he is to be accursed (anathema-delivered
over to the wrath of God)! As we have said before, so I say again now, if
any man is preaching to you a gospel contrary to what you received, he is to
be accursed" (Gal. 1:6-9).
TWO
What do I say to an individual who insists that the Sabbath is necessary
for on-going obedience to the Lord.
In other words, this person
accepts in the sufficiency of Christ for salvation, but still believes that
Christians should continue to observe the Sabbath command as it was delivered
to Israel under the Old Covenant. Most Christian Sabbatarians find themselves
in this camp. What would we say to such individuals?
First of all, these individuals
need to realize that we are under the New Covenant. What would be the purpose
of a New Covenant if all the requirements of the Old Covenant were still in
force? The New Covenant is not added to the Old Covenant. Rather the New Covenant
abolished the Old Covenant! Thats why the writer to the Hebrews remarked,
"When He said, A new covenant, He has made the first obsolete.
But whatever is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to disappear"
(Heb. 8:13).
The old covenant served
a purpose. Its purpose was to point to the apex of Gods revelation, Jesus
Christ. But now that Christ has arrived, the signs are to disappear in order
that Christ may receive all the attention and all the glory. This concurs with
Pauls comments in Colossians 2. "Therefore no one is to act as your
judge in regard to food or drink or in respect to a festival or a new moon or
a Sabbath day--things which are a mere shadow of what is to come; but
the substance belongs to Christ" (Col. 2:16-17).
In addition to misunderstanding
Gods plan of redemption, I believe current Sabbatarians also err by their
inconsistencies and lack of uniformity. I had the opportunity this week to read
a number of position papers from these churches, (solid churches committed to
the Word of God) and I was overwhelmed by their lack of consistency. None of
them came to any agreement as to how the Sabbath should be observed.
For starters, few churches
insist on keeping all of the law. They elevate the Sabbath, but fail to observe
the other rituals and ceremonies commanded to Israel such as other festivals,
animal sacrifices and worship in the temple. Some churches demand that the Sabbath
is more important since it is contained in the 10 Commandments, but then indirectly
contradict their own words by their actions. For instance many of these churches
would prohibit an unrepentant adulterer into membership, but have no problem
admitting someone who is not a strict Sabbatarian. Many of these churches would
discipline an unrepentant thief, but fail to discipline someone in their flock
who plays Frisbee with his kid on Sunday. Since when did one of Gods 10
Commandments receive greater lenience? Moses had a man stoned for picking up
sticks on the Sabbath (Num. 15:32-36)!
Sabbatarians disagree among
themselves as to exactly how the day should be observed. Some say it is strictly
a day of rest, but in the same breath say naps are to be avoided. Some say the
day is to be devoted to family activities, but then prohibit anything that involves
recreation with the family since that could be construed as work. Other churches
forbid watching football, yard work, shopping or helping your child with their
homework. One church even went as far to say that it is sinful to take a family
vacation on a Sunday. I quote, "There is a growing practice of missing
the worship services, now and then, because they interfere with our pleasures,
our vacations
There is the strange notion in the Church that the Fourth
Commandment may be broken occasionally. Men suppose that, if they remember the
Lords Day 51 weeks of the year, they are warranted in forgetting it one
week" (David Engesma).
At least this church was
consistent with the remainder of the Old Testament. They said, "When the
Israelite worked on the Sabbath (Nu. 15:31ff)
he despised the spiritual
rest of God. He revealed himself to be a worldly man. This deserved, and still
does deserve, the death penalty." I find it hard to believe that this church
is executing Sabbath offenders! I dont mean to be combative, but if you
wish to keep the Sabbath, you must keep it exactly as God delivered it to Israel!
THREE
What do I say to an individual who does not impose his beliefs but still
wants to observe one day as different than the others?
For a variety of reasons,
possibly out of convenience or culture or tradition, some people choose to place
special significance on one particular day. They see greater spirituality in
certain days of the week or certain days of the year. How should we respond
to such individuals?
Paul addressed this exact
situation in his letter to the Romans. "Now accept the one who is weak
in faith, but not for the purpose of passing judgment on his opinions
One
person regards one day above another, another regards every day alike. Each
person must be fully convinced in his own mind. He who observes the day, observes
it for the Lord
But you, why do you judge your brother? Or you again,
why do you regard your brother with contempt? For we will all stand before the
judgment seat of God
So then each one of us will give an account of himself
to God. Therefore let us not judge one another anymore, but rather determine
this-- not to put an obstacle or a stumbling block in a brother's way."
(Rom. 14:1, 5-6a, 10, 12-13).
In dealing with the issue
of observing certain days, Pauls desire was not to settle the argument.
Rather he promoted mutual respect and harmony between two parties. If someone
sees special significance in a day providing they do not impose their convictions
on others, leave him alone! We are not to judge a fellow brother or sister in
such matters of Christian liberty. However, Paul does side with the one who
"regards every day alike" as the mature believer.
RESPONSE TO THE
LORDS DAY
At this point I have responded
to the issue of the Jewish Sabbath. I have developed somewhat of an apologetic
based on three levels for those who place priorities on certain days. However,
one large stone has still been left unturned. What are we to make of Sunday,
our day of corporate worship, the day we commonly refer to as the "Lords
Day?" Allow me to make a few remarks regarding the Lords Day prior
to our time of Communion.
First of all, the
Christian Lords Day is not the Jewish Sabbath in a new package. The Sabbath
has not been moved from Saturday night to Sunday morning because the Old Covenant
Sabbath has been abolished. Therefore the requirements that applied to the Sabbath
are not binding on the Christian. They are not to be transferred over and be
celebrated on the Lords Day. Israels Sabbath was fulfilled in Christ.
Jesus observed the Sabbath
because He was under the law (Gal. 4:4). The early church went into the synagogues
on the Sabbath primarily for evangelistic purposes (Ac. 17:2; 18:4). But not
a single New Testament passage equates the meeting of the church for worship
with the Sabbath. When we compare the Sabbath and the Lords Day we are
comparing apples and oranges.
This leads us to the second
point. Why did Christians begin meeting for worship on Sundays? It appears that
every event of significance in the New Testament fell on Sunday, the first day
of the week. Obviously we are familiar with the most important, the resurrection
of our Lord (Mt. 28:1; Mk. 16:1-2, 9; Lk. 24:1; Jn. 20:1, 19). But also did
you know that many resurrection appearances, the Ascension and even the coming
of the Holy Spirit all took place on Sunday? Even the Apostle John while on
the island of Patmos received his revelation on the first day of the week or
what he refers to as the "Lords Day" (Rev. 1:10). Therefore
many in the early church chose Sunday as the most appropriate day for corporate
worship.
For example, in Acts 20
we read, "On the first day of the week, when we were gathered together
to break bread, Paul began talking to them, intending to leave the next
day, and he prolonged his message until midnight" (Ac. 20:7). On the first
day of the week, Sunday, this church in Troas gathered to celebrate Communion
and hear the Word of God proclaimed. In 1 Corinthians Paul said, "On the
first day of every week each one of you is to put aside and save, as
he may prosper, so that no collections be made when I come" (1 Cor. 16:2).
Paul called for financial collections to be received for the Lords work.
He specifically asked that the money be received on the first day of the week,
presumably the day when the church met.
By the beginning of the
second century, the early church writers made it very clear that the first day
of the week had been recognized for public, congregational worship. Justin Martyr
(110-190 AD) identified the Lords Day as "Sunday
the first day
and
Jesus Christ our Savior on that same day rose from the dead." He further
says on this day the saints assemble for worship. Clement (153-217 AD) said
we are to "keep the Lords Day" and thus "glorify the Lords
resurrection." The Constitution of the Holy Apostles said that on
this day we are to "meet more diligently
assembling ourselves together,
without fail." Even Ignatius (a disciple of the apostle John) described
Jewish Christians with these words, "They have come to the possession of
a new hope, no longer observing the Sabbath, but living in observance of the
Lords Day, on which also our life has sprung up again by Him."
Third, though Sunday
has taken on a special significance from the time in the early church until
this day for public worship, we must remember that we are not commanded to worship
on Sunday mornings. We have chosen Sunday mornings because of tradition, culture
and personal availability, but we must be careful not to elevate one day as
more important than the others. We must be careful when we say the Sabbath has
been abolished not to import Sabbatical principles into the Lords Day.
Under the New Covenant,
our rest occurs every day as we rest in Jesus Christ from our righteous works
and abide in Him through faith. Also under the New Covenant, our worship is
not confined to one day of the week. We dont just worship God on Sunday
mornings; we worship Him every day of the week (when we praise Him, confess
our sin, learn His Word, engage in fellowship, etc.). In a similar vein, we
celebrate our Saviors birth every day, not just on December 25th.
We celebrate His resurrection every day, not just on Easter morning. Every day
is alike. There is no division between the sacred and the secular. Every day
should be equally devoted to glorifying God (1 Cor. 10:31) as we "do
all in the name of the Lord Jesus" (Col. 3:17). If we choose to be
technical, we call it the Lords Day because He rose from the grave on
Sunday, but if we choose to be biblical, every day is the "Lords
Day!"
John Calvin once said,
"When certain days are represented as holy in themselves, when one day
is distinguished from another on religious grounds, when holy days are reckoned
a part of divine worship, then days are improperly observed
When we, in
the present age, make a distinction of days, we do not represent them as necessary,
and thus lay a snare for the conscience; we do not reckon one day to be more
holy than another; we do not make days to be the same thing with religion and
the worship of God; but merely attend to the preservation of order and harmony.
The observance of days among us is a free service, and void of all superstition."
Finally, based on
all we have mentioned, Sunday is the day that we have set aside to corporately
worship the Lord. We have chosen this day in the tradition of the early church,
not because we wish to continue the Sabbath observance, but rather because we
need a day to fulfill the requirements of the New Testament which call for the
public observance of Communion (Ac. 2:42; 1 Cor. 11:20, 25-26), baptisms (Ac.
2:38, 41), prayer (Ac. 2:42), fellowship (Ac. 2:42; Heb. 10:25) singing (Eph.
5:19), preaching (Ac. 2:42; 20:7) and the collection of the offertory (1 Cor.
16:2).
Every Christian should
prioritize the public gathering of the saints over the other activities that
call for our attention (sleep, youth activities, recreation, etc). Sunday is
a day that should be set aside for public worship. It is a day that should continue
and culminate our worship for the week. It is a day when we should be most prepared
and most alert for worship. And by way of suggestion, the remainder of the day
should be devoted to Christian fellowship and family worship centered on a discussion
of the sermon. However, no New Testament command is given that requires us to
observe Sunday any different than the other days of the week that we likewise
seek to glorify God.
Beloved, it simply comes
down to this. Jesus Christ demands total submission. He doesnt want part
of your heart; He wants all of your heart! He doesnt want your worship
one day; He wants your worship every day! Public worship is something we should
enjoy and something we should not forsake, but the worship of our Savior by
faith must extend beyond the Sabbath and beyond the Lords Day to every
day of the week.
|